翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Marechal Floriano
・ Marechal Foch
・ Marechal Hermes
・ Marechal Joffre
・ Marechal Rondon International Airport
・ Marechal Thaumaturgo
・ Marecidia
・ Marecidia achrysa
・ Marecidia sanguipuncta
・ Marecka Kolej Dojazdowa
・ Mareckie
・ Mareco Broadcasting Network
・ Mareco Index Bosnia
・ Mareczki
・ Mared
Maredelanto Compania Naviera SA v Bergbau-Handel GmbH
・ Maredo
・ Maredret Abbey
・ Maredsous
・ Maredsous (hamlet)
・ Maredsous Abbey
・ Maredsous cheese
・ Maredudd ab Owain
・ Maredudd ab Owain ab Edwin
・ Maredudd ab Owain Glyndŵr
・ Maredudd ap Bleddyn
・ Maredudd ap Cynan ab Owain Gwynedd
・ Maredudd ap Gruffydd
・ Maredudd ap Ifan
・ Maredudd ap Llywelyn ap Maredudd ap Cynan


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Maredelanto Compania Naviera SA v Bergbau-Handel GmbH : ウィキペディア英語版
Maredelanto Compania Naviera SA v Bergbau-Handel GmbH

''Maredelanto Compania Naviera SA v Bergbau-Handel GmbH'' or ''The Mihalis Angelos'' () (EWCA Civ 4 ) is an English contract law case, concerning breach of contract.
==Facts==
''The Mihalis Angelos'' was fixed to sail to Haiphong and there load a cargo for delivery in Europe. In the charterparty dated 25 May 1965 the owners stated that the ship was "expected ready to load under this charter about July 1, 1965". The charterparty also provided, in the first sentence of the cancelling clause,

"Should the vessel not be ready to load (whether in berth or not) on or before July 20, 1965, charterers have the option of cancelling this contract, such option to be declared, if demanded, at least 48 hours before vessel's expected arrival at port of loading".

On 17 July 1965 the ship was at Hong Kong, still discharging cargo from her previous voyage. It was physically impossible for her to finish discharging and reach Haiphong by 20 July. The charterers gave notice cancelling the charter. The owners treated this as a repudiation and claimed damages, which were the subject of arbitration and of an appeal to Mocatta J. On further appeal, there were three issues. The first was whether the "expected readiness" clause was a condition of which the owners were in breach, entitling the charterers to terminate the charter contract. The second issue was whether (if the answer to the first issue was wrong) the charterers had repudiated the contract by cancelling on 17 July, three days before the specified 20 July deadline. The third issue was as to the damage suffered by the owners, on the assumption that the charterers' premature cancellation had been a repudiation.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Maredelanto Compania Naviera SA v Bergbau-Handel GmbH」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.